New HIV Infections Soar In San Francisco...07/01/00  

SAN FRANCISCO, (Reuters) - San Francisco health  authorities are reporting a sharp jump in new HIV infections,  marking the start of what many doctors fear is a dangerous new  stage in America's AIDS epidemic.   City health officials estimate that, after years of relative  stability thanks to aggressive prevention programmes, safer-sex  publicity and new drug treatments, new HIV infections in San  Francisco doubled to 900 in the past year.

"We see in San Francisco what is going to happen next in  the epidemic. We saw the first AIDS infection, and now we're  seeing the first rise in new infections," Dr. Thomas Coates,  director of the AIDS Research Institute at the University of  California-San Francisco, said Friday. "This should sound a  warning bell for the rest of the country."

Health officials blame the rise in part on the success of  earlier AIDS prevention and treatment efforts, which have  combined to make the disease seem less threatening for many gay  men.

Doctors said the San Francisco data, derived from city  clinics that provide anonymous testing for the virus which  causes AIDS, was the first to illustrate a direct link between  new HIV infections and an increase in risky behaviour which  experts have tracked over the past five years.

San Francisco, known around the world as a gay capital,  became one of the first centres of the AIDS epidemic in the  early 1980s, when as many as half the gay men in the city were  believed to be infected with HIV. Since 1981, more than 18,000  San Franciscans have died of AIDS.

Quick action by the city's gay community and public health  officials also made San Francisco a model for the fight against  AIDS, pushing new HIV infections down from an estimated high of  6,000 in 1982 to a fairly steady 500 per year throughout most of  the 1990s.

The estimated total for 2000, however, is between 800 and  900, with gay men accounting for about 575 of the new HIV  infections, according to Dr. Willi McFarland of the city's  Department of Public Health.

More alarming still, the percentage of HIV positive cases  turning up at anonymous testing centres nearly tripled between  1997 and 1999 to reach 3.7 percent -- a level comparable to some  areas of sub-Saharan Africa.

The testing centres are seen as an early warning system for  the rest of the city because they serve a higher-risk clientele  than in the general population.

Doctors say the soaring rate of HIV infection, while  alarming, is no surprise. They have tracked a similar rise in  risky behaviour as new AIDS drugs have made the disease seem  less threatening.

The proportion of gay men in San Francisco who reported  always using a condom during sex fell from 70 percent in 1994 to  54 percent in 1999, and the proportion who said they had  unprotected anal sex with more than one partner grew from 23  percent in 1994 to 43 percent in 1999, health officials said.

Rates of rectal gonorrhea in the city have risen from 20 per  100,000 in 1994 to 45 per 100,000 in 1999.

Health policy officials said Friday that the data clearly  illustrated the need for continued outreach and AIDS prevention  efforts among gay men in San Francisco -- although some  cautioned that the city's data could not necessarily be  interpreted as marking the future course of the AIDS epidemic in  other U.S. cities.

"The statistics very clearly point to a well-defined target  population, and a particular behavioural pattern. This is a  trend that can certainly be contained," said Rene Durazzo,  director of programmes at the San Francisco AIDS Foundation.

Unlike many other U.S. cities, San Francisco has not seen a  notable rise in HIV infections among women, and its  needle-exchange programme has helped to keep new infections  among intravenous drug users relatively low, Durazzo said.

"People have to look at their own individual epidemics and  do their homework about what is going on in their own cities,"  Durazzo said. "But what this tell us is that this epidemic is  far from over, and it is not time to shift resources elsewhere.  Otherwise, we are setting ourselves up for another wave of  infections, and huge loss and death."   http://www.abcnews.go.com/wire/World/reuters20000630_3159.html  

Main Menu